New York Law Journal "District Court Reduces Class Counsel’s Attorney Fee Award in Light of Reversionary Clause" by Thomas E.L. Dewey

April 24, 2019

When parties to a class action reach a settlement agreement and include a clause that defendant will not oppose class counsel’s attorney fee award, they may expect that the unopposed fee will be approved by the court. But a recent decision from the Southern District of New York reminds us that courts have an interest in ensuring the reasonableness of attorney fees and protecting the members of the class. Courts are particularly wary of reversionary clauses, which allow the defendant to recoup portions of the settlement fund not claimed during a claims process.

 

In Grice v. Pepsi Beverages Co., No. 17-CV-8853 (JPO), 2019 WL 340714 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 28, 2019), after reaching a class action settlement, class counsel sought approval of their attorney fees. The court reduced the attorney fee award by more than one-third based primarily on the reversionary clause in the settlement agreement.

Read more.

 

This article first appeared in the New York Law Journal on April 24, 2019. Sarah A. Sheridan, an associate at the firm, assisted with the preparation of this article.

Please reload

Featured Posts

Recently two New York courts addressed intellectual property issues in conflict with video game realism and reached the same conclusion in two differe...

New York Law Journal “From Battlefields to Basketball Courts: Real World IP Issues Arise From Realistic Video Games” by Stephen M. Kramarsky for New Y...

May 18, 2020

1/5
Please reload

Recent Posts
Please reload

Archive