New York Law Journal "District Court Lacks Jurisdiction to Enforce a Settlement and Appeal" Thomas E.L. Dewey

February 13, 2018

Few events in the course of a litigation are as likely to prompt settlement discussion as the resolution of a dispositive motion. The parties’ claims and defenses have been tested, and the strengthened negotiating position of the successful party is clear to both. But, as a recent decision in the Southern District of New York reminds us, there are pitfalls that come with negotiating a settlement in the wake of successful motion to dismiss. If those negotiations turn sour, and one party seeks to enforce a settlement agreement, the parties may be left without a clear judicial home to resolve the dispute.


In Wilson v. Dynatone Publishing Co., No. 16-cv-104 (PAE), 2018 WL 485970 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 18, 2018), the plaintiffs moved to enforce a settlement agreement they claimed had been reached after the district court’s dismissal of their claims and the filing of a notice of appeal. Judge Engelmayer denied the motion for lack of jurisdiction.

Read more.

Please reload

Featured Posts

Recently two New York courts addressed intellectual property issues in conflict with video game realism and reached the same conclusion in two differe...

New York Law Journal “From Battlefields to Basketball Courts: Real World IP Issues Arise From Realistic Video Games” by Stephen M. Kramarsky for New Y...

May 18, 2020

Please reload

Recent Posts
Please reload